Leave a reply Have you ever dreamt about the improvement of life in your country. When there is no need to leave their poor countries with the hope to get support with studying abroad, academically talented young people will stay in their native countries and work for the betterment of the situation in their country.
They do not care about water and air.
Cost-effectiveness and financial sustainability: Higher education is therefore very important to national economiesboth as a significant industry in its own right and as a source of trained and educated personnel for the rest of the economy. Even in the developed countries where the economic situation is better, young people may prefer working to studying because of the need to repay debts or insufficient family income.
For many learners, this includes language acquisitioncultural normsand manners. The report showed some cases of successful voucher and subsidy programs; evaluations of international support to the sector are not widespread.
Second, when the state funds all university education for free, funding will be allocated to unprofitable courses. With a substantial investment as an input, education is reduced to being a choice — and often, a less favored one. States tend to let universities govern themselves, accepting that they are generally better through self-governance.
Thus, free education gives young people a hope for better future. Educated people have more chances to get a good job with a good salary.
Undoubtedly, our appetites are unlimited. So, I agree with the argument that the best way to reduce poverty in developing nations is to provide free education to their children.
For example, "Congress has passed a number of silly bills based on narrow political interests.
What are the reasons of this difference in progress. I see no reason to disagree.
In other words, these colleges are skewing the finance statistics for higher education. They have to attend extra classes and hire private teachers. Or that the program could take away from instructional time at the start of the school day. Every individual, when higher education is free, can attend university without cost.
Therefore, I strongly agree with the argument that it should be free for all children.
Collectively, these are sometimes known as tertiary institutions. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. How to Write A Five-Paragraph Essay Step-by-step instructions for planning, outlining, and writing a five-paragraph essay.
This essay is the winner of The Economist’s Open Future essay competition in the category of Open Ideas, responding to the question: “What should a commitment to free speech on campus entail. Later, if free education is appreciated and people use it for good benefits, it is a must for a country to provide free education.
A lot of hidden intelligence will be discovered behind those poverty walls. The education sector or education system is a group of institutions (ministries of education, local educational authorities, teacher training institutions, schools, universities, etc.) whose primary purpose is to provide education to children and young people in educational settings.
Every country’s government provides education. In almost all countries in the world, child education is compulsory and children are required to stay in school until a minimum of age 16; child education is free. Essay topic. The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to 6 years of free education to children, so that they can at least read, write and use numbers.
The next important thing that the government should do is provide good education to its citizens. Freedom is a powerful tool, but it can be dangerous in the hands of people who are illiterate.
Freedom is a powerful tool, but it can be dangerous in the hands of people who are illiterate.Should a country provide free education essay